ELI5: Explain Like I'm 5

Abramski v. United States

Okay, so there was a guy named Bruce Abramski who wanted to buy a gun but he had a problem. He lived in one state and the gun he wanted to buy was in another state. So, he asked his uncle who lived in the other state to buy the gun for him and then he would give his uncle the money to pay for it.

But here's the thing – there's a law that says you can't buy a gun for someone else, even if they give you the money for it. That's because the government wants to make sure that only responsible people get guns.

So, the government found out what Bruce did and they arrested him for breaking the law. Bruce said that he didn't really break the law because he was still the one who bought the gun, even though his uncle did it for him. He said that he didn't do anything wrong because he could have just gone to the other state and bought the gun himself.

The court had to decide if Bruce really broke the law or not. They looked at the law and decided that what Bruce did was not allowed. It doesn't matter who bought the gun, as long as Bruce asked his uncle to do it for him, it's still breaking the law.

So, Bruce was found guilty of breaking the law and he had to pay a fine and spend time in jail. The lesson here is that you can't ask someone else to buy a gun for you – you have to do it yourself if you want to follow the law.