ELI5: Explain Like I'm 5

Criticism of credit scoring systems in the United States

Credit scoring is like a report card for how good you are at paying back money you borrow. It's a number, usually between 300 and 850, that tells lenders how reliable you are with your money. A high score means you're good at paying back loans on time, and a low score means you're not as good at it.

But some people say that credit scoring systems in the United States aren't fair. That's because the systems use factors like your income, job, and where you live to calculate your score. This can cause some people to be judged unfairly.

For example, if you live in a poor neighborhood, your credit score might be lower even if you always pay your bills on time. That's because people in poor neighborhoods may not have as many opportunities to borrow money, so they might not have as much experience with loans or credit cards. This can make it harder for them to get a high score, even if they're responsible with their money.

Similarly, if you have a low-paying job, your credit score might be lower even if you're good at managing your money. This is because people with higher-paying jobs are seen as more creditworthy by lenders, even if they have a history of not paying back loans.

Another problem with credit scoring systems is that they don't take into account things like medical debt, which can be a big burden for many people. If you have a lot of medical bills, your credit score might suffer even if you've been paying all your other bills on time.

So some people think that credit scoring systems in the United States need to be updated to be more fair. They want lenders to look beyond factors like income and job to get a more accurate picture of a person's creditworthiness. They also want to make sure that things like medical debt are taken into account when calculating scores, so that people aren't unfairly penalized for something that's often outside of their control.