Okay kiddo, let me explain what the drift-barrier hypothesis is! Imagine we have a species of animals living in a certain area. Over time, small changes may happen to their genes as they mate and reproduce. These changes are called mutations, and they can either be good, bad or have no effect at all.
Now, sometimes these mutations can help the animals adapt to their environment better, making them stronger and healthier. Other times, the mutations are harmful and lead to the animals not doing as well.
But here's where the drift-barrier hypothesis comes in: it suggests that there's a limit to how much useful change can happen in a population before it becomes too difficult to keep spreading those changes. It's like a bell curve shaped graph where the middle is the sweet spot for beneficial genes.
Imagine the population is like a big barrel. You can pour in a little water and it will easily spread throughout the whole barrel. But if you pour in too much, it won't be able to spread as easily because the water is blocked by the "drift barrier" which is the genes of animals that do not have any beneficial mutations.
Sometimes it's even harder for the good changes to spread because of things like geography, weather or other conditions. This doesn't mean that the bad genes will necessarily die out, they can still survive in small quantities.
In short, the drift-barrier hypothesis suggests that there's a maximum limit to how much useful change can happen in a population before it gets harder and harder to spread. It's like the idea that you can't have too much of a good thing!