Jurisprudence of values

Jurisprudence of values is a big fancy term for how judges or people who work in the law, think about what is right and wrong when making legal decisions. Think of it like when you're playing a game and you have to follow the rules. Sometimes, you might have to make a decision about what is fair or not fair, and that's what judges do, but with a lot more rules and complicated stuff.

So, when judges are deciding what is right or wrong, they have to think about important ideas or values like freedom, equality, fairness, and justice. They want to make sure that they are making decisions that are fair for everyone and that follow the rules.

Just like how you have different rules for different games, there are different values that judges might think are more important depending on the situation. For example, in a case about whether someone should be punished for breaking the law, a judge might think that justice is the most important value because it's important to make sure that people who break the law are held accountable. But in another case about whether people should have equal rights, a judge might think that equality is the most important value because it's important to make sure that everyone is treated the same.

Overall, jurisprudence of values is about making sure that the law is fair and follows important values that everyone can agree on. It’s like playing a game, but everyone has to follow the rules!