ELI5: Explain Like I'm 5

Somerset v Stewart

Somerset v Stewart was a court case that happened a very long time ago in England. A man named James Somerset was a slave who was owned by a man named Charles Stewart. One day, Charles Stewart took James Somerset to a place called Virginia, where slavery was allowed. But James Somerset didn't want to be a slave anymore.

So, James Somerset tried to escape from Charles Stewart in Virginia and he managed to come all the way back to England. Once he got there, James Somerset claimed that he was free because slavery was not allowed in England.

But Charles Stewart didn't agree with James Somerset. He believed that he still owned him because he bought him in Virginia where slavery was allowed. So, Charles Stewart captured James Somerset and put him on a ship to take him back to Virginia.

The problem was that many people in England didn't like slavery and they thought that Charles Stewart was doing something wrong by trying to take James Somerset back to Virginia. So, they went to court and asked the judge what to do.

The judge, whose name was Lord Mansfield, thought about it for a long time before making his decision. He said that a person could not be taken from England to be a slave in another country. This meant that James Somerset was free and could not be made a slave again by Charles Stewart.

This was a very important decision because it meant that slavery could not be enforced in England. It was the first time that a major country ruled against slavery and helped pave the way for abolitionism in other parts of the world, like the United States.