ELI5: Explain Like I'm 5

Critique of the Kantian Philosophy

Okay, so you know how when you do something, you must ask yourself if it is right or wrong, and you often consider what other people may think? Well, there's a guy named Kant who had a lot of ideas about how we make those decisions, and some people don't think he was right.

Kant believed that there was something called the "Categorical Imperative" that helped us figure out what was right or wrong. It's like a set of rules that you always follow, no matter what, and it always leads to the right thing to do. It's kind of like when you always know you should share your toys, even if you don't want to.

People who critique Kant's philosophy think that the Categorical Imperative is too broad to be useful. They say that because it doesn't give specific instructions on what to do, it can be hard to interpret what it means in certain situations. It's kind of like if your mom told you to "do the right thing," but she didn't tell you what that meant.

Another thing they critique is the idea of "goodwill." Kant said that doing something good for goodness' sake, and not for any other reason (like getting a reward) was the best kind of behavior. But some people think that that's not realistic- we all have some kind of motivation for our actions, whether it be happiness, self-satisfaction or something else.

In conclusion, Kant's philosophies have given rise to many critical views that show the limits of his ideas; however, they remain relevant in modern ethics and continue to have a significant impact on today's philosophers.