Okay kiddo, let's talk about a court case called Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co. It's a story about a company that owned a piece of land where they were mining for a mineral called phosphate. Erlanger was a banker who loaned money to this company, and when they couldn't pay him back, he took them to court.
Now, the court had to decide who owned the rights to that land - the company that was mining for phosphate or the banker who had loaned them money. It was like two people fighting over a toy and the judge had to decide who got to keep it.
But it wasn't just about the land - there were also rules and agreements that the company and the banker had made before this, and the court had to decide if those were fair and legal too. It was kind of like when you and your friend make a deal to share candy, but then one of you eats more than the other and the other one is upset.
In the end, the court ruled in favor of the banker, saying that he had the right to the land and the company had to pay him back his loan. It was like the judge said, "Okay, the toy belongs to you, and your friend has to give you some of their own toys to make up for it."
So, that's the story of Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co., where a company and a banker fought over a piece of land and the court had to decide who owned it.