ELI5: Explain Like I'm 5

Charlebois v Saint John (City of)

Okay kiddo, so there was a person named Daniel Charlebois who lived in the city of Saint John, which is in the country of Canada. He wanted to build a deck on his house, but the city said he couldn't because it would block the view of a nearby historic site.

Daniel was upset and thought that the city's decision was unfair, so he took them to court. He argued that the city didn't have the right to stop him from building the deck on his own property.

The court case went on for a long time and lots of people talked about it. In the end, the court decided that the city was allowed to make rules about what people can and cannot do on their own property if it has an impact on the community.

So, even though Daniel Charlebois was sad that he couldn't build his deck, the court said that the city was allowed to make rules to protect important community things, like historic sites.

Does that help you understand, kiddo?